Jeremy Millar – Enclave Review http://enclavereview.org A Contemporary Arts Reviews Sheet Based in Cork Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:47:29 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5 The Other Dark / Now Wakes the Sea http://enclavereview.org/the-other-dark-now-wakes-the-sea/ Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:47:29 +0000 http://enclavereview.org/?p=3897 The Other Dark and Now Wakes the Sea had several points in common. Apart from running almost concurrently in the Cork area, Kirstie North curated the Sirius Arts Centre exhibition and co-curated the Glucksman show with Chris Clarke. Tacita Dean’s work featured in both exhibitions, as did Lucy Skaer’s (working in collaboration with Rosalind Nashashibi in The Other Dark). Both exhibitions were concerned with responding to a haunting resonance, the origins of which are submerged either in time or in the ocean’s depths. And, finally, there is the sea: it was the subject of Now Wakes the Sea but an inescapable presence outside the windows of the Sirius where The Other Dark held sway. Given that both shows trace links between distant objects and events, whether through space, history, or the subconscious, it was hard to escape the feeling of the ocean being a connecting medium between them.

The Other Dark. Installation shot. Sirius Arts Centre, Cobh (2017). Works featured: Jeremy Millar: Melancholy Mobile (2017). Wood, paint. Jeremy Millar: The Man Who Looked Back (2010). Oak display stands, hessian-covered display screens, archive photographs and film stills mounted on card, clips, pins. Courtesy of the author and the Sirius Arts Centre.
The Other Dark. Installation shot. Sirius Arts Centre, Cobh (2017). Works featured: Jeremy Millar: Melancholy Mobile (2017). Wood, paint. Jeremy Millar: The Man Who Looked Back (2010). Oak display stands, hessian-covered display screens, archive photographs and film stills mounted on card, clips, pins. Courtesy of the author and the Sirius Arts Centre.

 
The Other Dark brought together pieces by Dean, Skaer / Nashashibi and Jeremy Millar that revisit or reach back to particular works from art history. The two pieces featured by Jeremy Millar reference German art historian Aby Warburg. The Man Who Looked Back (2010) is based on Warburg’s Mnemosyne Atlas (1924-1929), a project described by Christopher D. Johnson as an ‘attempt to map the “afterlife of antiquity,” or how images of great symbolic, intellectual, and emotional power emerge in Western antiquity and then reappear and are reanimated in the art and cosmology of later times’. Millar’s panel ‘map’ of images, based on the format of Warburg’s Atlas, consists of representations of the legend of Orpheus and Eurydice from throughout history. In this legend, Orpheus is allowed to reclaim Eurydice from the afterlife provided he does not look back at her, which he does with dire consequences. This citation problematizes the act of ‘looking back’ while granting ambiguous success to the Orphic journey of reclamation. In the context of this show, it could be read as saying that it is possible to approach objects and moments lost in the past, but it is the process of doing so and the distance covered that offer rewards. The original ‘look’ upon the work that inspired this process is impossible to replicate with the passage of time.

Marcel Dinahet: Dinard (1992). Still. Colour video, sound. 1 min. 57 sec. Courtesy of the artist and Domobaal, London.
Marcel Dinahet: Dinard (1992). Still. Colour video, sound. 1 min. 57 sec. Courtesy of the artist and Domobaal, London.

 
Rather than a direct ‘look back’ at any of the artworks they reference, the pieces in this exhibition did mainly approach them as beacons to navigate a journey through space (Dean) or time (Nashashibi / Skaer). Dean’s audio documentation of her search for the site of Robert Smithson’s Spiral Jetty, the narrative of a journey, even contains the suggestion that Smithson’s directions were simply a ruse to allow people to experience the beautiful landscape she passes through. Nashashibi / Skaer’s film Our Magnolia (2009) sees Paul Nash’s 1944 painting Flight of the Magnolia, created under the shadow of anticipated German invasion, through the filter of more recent contexts such as the Iraq War and Thatcherism. Yet it is filmed and projected on the increasingly rare medium of 16mm, which lends it a sense of operating outside of the contemporary moment, especially when it shows computer monitors shot on grainy celluloid in a reversal of the now usual sight of digitized celluloid images. Rather than speaking from one point in time or the other, this aesthetic decision allows the artists to gather and encompass multiple moments without quite belonging to any. Millar’s Melancholy Mobile (2017) sculptures translate a mysterious polyhedron that appears in an Albrecht Dürer engraving through Alexander Calder’s suspended shapes. The resulting forms reverse the ‘looking back’ found in the rest of the show to instead present an object that has travelled through art history and arrived with us reshaped by it along the way.

Janaina Tchäpe: Fernweh I (2015). Mixed media on paper. 152 x 234 cm. Courtesy of Carlier Gebauer, Berlin.
Janaina Tchäpe: Fernweh I (2015). Mixed media on paper. 152 x 234 cm. Courtesy of Carlier Gebauer, Berlin.

 
Now Wakes the Sea was to be found some miles inland from the Sirius, at a distance from the coast that turned out to be quite appropriate. This take on ‘contemporary art and the ocean’ borrowed its title from a J.G. Ballard story in which an ancient sea is now the site of a suburb. For one of its residents, however, this ocean returns every night and threatens to engulf the neighbourhood. This exhibition likewise addressed the sea as something distant and other, a haunting concept that readily acts as medium for ideas and sensations of submersion and salvage, as well as the seduction of oblivion.

 
Tacita Dean’s photographs concerning the disappearance of Donald Crowhurst effectively rely on the absence of the ocean for their power. Crowhurst was an amateur sailor who succumbed to insanity and suicide in 1969 while attempting to circumnavigate the world alone on a trimaran. Dean bookends this archetypal narrative with one archive shot of Crowhurst setting out on his voyage and two contemporary photographs of Berwick Lighthouse, as if still awaiting his safe arrival. Between these discreet documentary images, the ocean is a vast and chilling lacuna that has swallowed the man and his story whole. Andreas Kindler von Knobloch, by contrast, enacts the simple desire for sublime experience through photo-documenting his sailing excursions around Dublin Bay. These images resemble nothing so much as advertising for an outdoor pursuits line. He references another disappearance at sea, that of conceptual artist Bas Jan Adler, but does so as a sort of elusive experiential horizon to which his overbearingly emphasized presence can only provide an ironic counterpoint.

 
Marcel Dinahet approaches disappearance at sea from an arguably more poignant angle, although in this case the disappearance is of his art works in the ocean depths rather than of people. His two videos featured in the exhibition document sculptural pieces installed at the bottom of the sea. These stone objects have a deceptively functional appearance that makes them feel part of their marine surroundings in the way that old wreckage might, their texture blending well with the surrounding sands. The underwater camera in these looped videos repeatedly passes over the works, unable to find a fixed position in the current and thus giving the impression of an obsessively repeated final glance at objects that the artist can’t quite bring himself to definitively relinquish to the anonymity of the seabed. Sean Lynch’s photographs only seem to confirm Dinahet’s anxieties. The history behind his pictures of metal casts from a bankrupt Belfast DeLorean factory repurposed as anchors in Galway Bay is provided in print, but the testimony of his images is pure texture. The leveling power of the rusting seawater prevails and seems to erase any trace of prior histories.

 
Back on the water’s surface, an installation by Conrad Shawcross documents a rowing trip he took up the River Lea, a tributary of the Thames, with almost parodic literalness. Its centerpiece is a video emitting from a projector mounted in a boat. This rotates 360 degrees like an earnest little robot replicating the circular movement of Shawcross’ camcorder recording the journey in real time.

 
Lucy Skaer also presents us with a ‘boat’ but one that is still journeying. Her Good Ship Blank and Ballast (2010-2018) is part of an ongoing project based on Plato’s Ship of Fools that evolves as it moves from gallery to gallery. In this iteration, it is a small boat-shaped object with cloth sails, and concrete blocks around its base. The pattern in the sails is actually a reflection of the floor tile pattern featured in a previous installation of this project. Without that context, however, it immediately evokes a more general sense of the urban, domestic and manmade, as suggested by the materials she employs. Reshaped as a boat, these elements are set adrift by the sea as a subconscious image of instability. It was the first work that visitors encountered on entering the exhibition and perfectly encapsulated this uncanny Ballardian thematic that ran through the show. If drift underlies Skaer’s pieces, Maria McKinney’s troubling Abyssals (2014) are more suggestive of submergence. These are large net sculptures containing materials such as fruit and vegetables, false nails, expanding foam and concrete, as well as the artist’s breath. Large in scale and unsettlingly intimate in material, their shapes resemble organic undersea growths, as if supported and formed by water on all sides. Yet these cloying forms are composed of manmade detritus, combining edible, cosmetic, building and bodily elements in a way that suggests an oneiric and startling reconfiguring of discarded matter that is still invisibly clinging to us.

 
The seductive lure of the sea also flowed through the exhibition thanks to the presence of Janaina Tschäpe’s work. Not only were her paintings hung at intervals throughout the show, but the liltingly woozy Russian sailor’s song that accompanies her wonderful video He Drowned in Her Eyes as She Called Him to Follow (2000) also drifted across the whole gallery, a siren song drawing visitors towards this last piece in the show. It is a semi-narrative work that suggests mermaid legends as it follows the dazed wanderings of a woman apparently fished from the sea. Its infectious atmosphere of sea, sun and sensuousness effortlessly absorbs kitsch and nostalgia into a shimmering and fragile lo-fi visual texture which seems constantly on the point of dissolving everything in light and water. The joy of dissolving is, however, ultimately linked to loss and death. Tschäpe’s video is an appropriately celebratory summation of the ambivalent attraction of this watery oblivion that flowed throughout Now Wakes the Sea.

 
The Other Dark and Now Wakes the Sea approached their subjects obliquely, as reflections or echoes. The primary concerns relating to both the ocean and to art historical landmarks were presented not as isolated or discrete points of interest, but as having been fully absorbed by contemporary forms of artistic awareness, while remaining resonant within them. The way in which the vastness of the sea and the deep reservoir of art historical tradition haunt contemporary art and culture was subtly articulated by both of these exhibitions.

 
The Other Dark was on view 16 July – 26 August 2017. Now Wakes the Sea was on view 4 August – 5 November 2017.

]]>
Simon Starling: Never the Same River (Possible Futures, Probable Pasts) http://enclavereview.org/simon-starling-never-the-same-river-possible-futures-probable-pasts/ Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:52:29 +0000 http://enclavereview.org/?p=844 In Never the Same River, Simon Starling anticipates possible futures for Camden Arts Centre by juxtaposing a range of works from its past exhibition programme with pieces by younger artists. Indeed, the show’s aim, to destabilise the present by attending to its past and its future, is shared in various ways by each of the individual works, which were selected for their ability to ‘worry at the borders of our understanding of time’.
 
David Lamelas’ A Study of Relationships Between Inner and Outer Space was first filmed and screened at Camden Arts Centre during the run up to the Apollo moon landing in 1969. This documentary style film begins inside the gallery, with long shots of the exhibition space. The scope is then expanded and we see Finchley Road itself. As the camera continues to zoom out, by way of a rocket ascending, we get an overview of London including aerial maps and statistics concerning the population, transport networks and communication systems of the time. The film concludes with a passer-by speculating on a future in space. Viewing this film in the same location as it was originally shot makes us acutely aware of the time that has elapsed since the film was first screened. This positioning of the viewer in the same location in space seems to dramatise the distance felt between different historical moments and this effect serves as a good introduction to the rest of Starling’s show. Indeed, all of the works that had been exhibited previously are placed in exactly the same position that they once occupied.
 
Matthew Buckingham’s False Future (2007), a 16mm film installation depicting an anonymous looking bridge in Leeds, was originally exhibited as part of his solo show of the same year. Filmed during the daytime, the footage shows passers-by mundanely going about their business. A French narrator then begins to tell the story of Louis Le Prince, the little-known inventor who developed a working motion picture system at least five years before the Lumière Brothers. Had Le Prince not mysteriously disappeared aboard a train between Dijon and Paris in 1890, he would most likely be known today as the originator of cinema and the medium of film would also have existed five years earlier. The narrator informs us that twenty-six frames of film survived Le Prince, and he goes on to describe the footage which appears to correspond to the footage on screen. This work enters into dialogue with that of Lamelas as the same location in space is viewed again at a different time. Placed next to Buckingham’s work is Douglas Huebler’s Duration Piece #31 Boston (1974), first exhibited at CAC in 2002. Huebler’s black-and-white photograph depicts a naked woman smiling for the camera. This photograph was taken on December 31st 1973 at 1/8 of a second before midnight. The exposure time was 1/4 of a second and because of this the woman’s body occupies an undecidable temporal position, located halfway between 1973 and 1974. The juxtaposition of these works by Buckingham and Huebler was predetermined, due to their previous appearance at CAC, however both works also seem comfortable together as explorations of the nature and history of time-based media.
 
Mike Nelson: A studio apparatus for Camden Arts Centre; an introductory structure: Introduction, a lexicon of phenomena and information association, futurobjectics, (in three sections), mysterious island*, or Temporary monument (1998). Installation view, Never The Same River (Possible Futures, Probable Pasts) – Selected by Simon Starling, 2010. Courtesy the artist and Camden Arts Centre. © Camden Arts Centre. Photo Andy Keate.
Mike Nelson: A studio apparatus for Camden Arts Centre; an introductory structure: Introduction, a lexicon of phenomena and information association, futurobjectics, (in three sections), mysterious island*, or Temporary monument (1998). Installation view, Never The Same River (Possible Futures, Probable Pasts) – Selected by Simon Starling, 2010. Courtesy the artist and Camden Arts Centre. © Camden Arts Centre. Photo Andy Keate.

Two works concerned with time travel both making their debut here are Sean Lynch’s DeLorean Progress Report (2010), and Jeremy Millar’s The Man who Looked Back (2010). Lynch’s project traces the DeLorean car to the bottom of the Irish Sea, combining photographs of the rusty material on the sea bed with hand pressed stainless steel models of the DeLorean roof and wing panels. These models are instantly recognisable as an icon of time travel from the 1980s, made famous by Spielberg’s Back to the Future trilogy. Millar’s archival work The Man Who Looked Back continues the artist’s preoccupation with German art historian Aby Warburg. Photographic reproductions of images taken from art history (all relating to the myth of Orpheus, for whom ‘looking back’ had tragic consequences) are posted onto hessian covered free-standing boards, giving the project the aged look of an historical museum display. Among these older images are a number of stills taken from Chris Marker’s La Jetée (1962), one of the most convincing expressions of time-travel in film.

 
As Starling anticipates CAC’s future programme with works by Lynch and Millar, Graham Gussin’s Fall (7200-1) (1998) exploits an agitated sense of expectation concerning a future event. Fall dominates the main gallery space and consists of a large projection of a lake coupled with a hard drive and computer that houses generating software randomly triggering an event in which we see something fall out of the sky, dramatically disturbing the surface of the lake. This event occurs so infrequently that the work becomes not so much about the disturbance but about the possibility of witnessing it, the state of anticipation holding the viewer in front of the tranquil scene for long periods of time, often with no reward.
 
Starling’s show works coherently on many levels, engaging the viewer’s collective and social memory whilst also engaging with the memories and objects that haunt CAC’s history. Starling himself is one such ghostly figure, now returning to the centre after a residency in 1999 and a solo show in 2000. For his solo show Starling had installed a roughly-built stove entitled Burn-Time in Gallery 3. When CAC was refurbished soon after, the architects, without realising the stove to be a temporary edition, included it in their plans. Starling’s own work is now an integral part of CAC’s structure, a strange coincidence because his great-great-uncle was the architect of the original building. Starling’s project is inspired by this meeting across time, between the architect who designed the Centre’s outer space and his future nephew, who time and again has transformed its inner space.
 
 
Simon Starling: Never the Same River was on view 16 December 2010 – 20 February 2011.

]]>