Seán Lynch – Enclave Review http://enclavereview.org A Contemporary Arts Reviews Sheet Based in Cork Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:12:08 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5 Contour of the Commons http://enclavereview.org/contour-of-the-commons/ Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:04:45 +0000 http://enclavereview.org/?p=1254 With the Centre for Contemporary Art Derry-Londonderry in the process of relocating to new premises, Contours of the Commons was reconceptualised as an exhibition woven into the fabric of the city, with its artworks dispersed over a large area. It was devised by C.C.A. curators Johan Lundh and Aileen Burns in collaboration with PLACE (Architecture and Built Environment Centre for Northern Ireland), and involved seven artists presenting projects in the public realm, along with architectural tours and a map cataloguing the permanent public artworks in Derry that ‘form the daily experience of place’. A small satellite space in the Craft Village on Shipquay Street functioned as a hub for activities.
 
From the outset my expectations for this exhibition were founded on misguided assumptions. I imagined Derry as a volatile city, a contested site. The enduring removal of the prefix ‘London’ on road signs proclaims entrance into a ‘Free Derry’. The city walls and the Peace Bridge straddling the river Foyle attest to the city’s merchant, industrial, and militarised pasts, while attempts to negotiate the emerging consumerist aesthetic of 20th century, ‘post-conflict’, urban regeneration, seem on-going.
 
In this post-financial-meltdown era of uprisings, protests, and riots, and the further blurring of protest with culture – Occupy biennials and post-feminist masquerades – the term ‘Commons’ has resurfaced, with political and ideological potential. Where Capital monetises property and privatises public space, the Commons, as theorised by Michael Hardt and others, proposes an alternative vision of shared, immaterial creativity.
 
I expected this treatment of Commons in Derry to be somewhat gritty, reactionary, and politically charged, aimed at reclaiming the public realm from the rhetoric of terror. Instead, the exhibition was unobtrusive and fresh, functioning as a silhouette, mapping various sites within the city, denoting layered and interconnected histories without disruption or agitation, and filtering them through the spaces where the Commons traditionally exists. The visual and aural environment, media, natural and man-made habitats, land and the public sphere, all featured within this sustainable approach to site-specific intervention.
 
Andrea Geyer’s billboard project entitled Spiral Lands / A place is not an object (2012) engaged with the visual Commons, specifically advertising space, in several locations around the city. This project began in 2008 as a photographic investigation into land and identity in the U.S, but offered a distinct resonance in the context of Derry city, where contentious territorial historiographies continue to frame (mis)understandings of identities and the daily realities of its inhabitants.
 
Amy Balkin’s project, This is the Public Domain (2003-2012), consisted of a digital stills projection and a vitrine containing a range of ephemera documenting her ongoing correspondence with the Bureau of Land Management in the U.S. In trying to turn her 2.64 acre site in Tehchapi California into a permanent international Public Commons, the artist encountered an array of legal constraints relating to public access, leaving her wondering rhetorically, ‘how can I find the public domain?’
 
Johan Tirén’s audio work When I closed my eyes all I could hear was the sound of the past (2012) struck me as being an arboreal sound-scape for ongoing conflict-resolution, a resolution formed out of an acceptance of history, allowing growth to take place in the present and continue into the future. Botanical inquiry played a part in a number of other projects. While Lara Almarcegui’s Enclosed Gardens (2004) considered the legacies of large-scale cultural events like biennials for the regeneration of urban wasteland, Andrew Dodds consulted with an ecologist to survey the plant-life growing on Derry’s city walls, producing A Pattern to Make the City by (2012). Both projects were formed out of a fidelity to local knowledge and an acknowledgement of the capacity of ‘non-spaces’ to ‘support unique demographics and life-cycles’, as Laura Britton comments on the Liverpool Biennial website. In imagining links between ‘habitat’ and ‘habitus’ that encourage social life to thrive and be self-sustaining, regeneration needs the right conditions to succeed. These are to be found at the level of ecosystems, of which the Commons is a particularly fruitful model.
 
Andrea Geyer: Spiral Lands, A place is not an Object, 2012. Billboard. Image courtesy of C.C.A Derry-Londonderry.
Andrea Geyer: Spiral Lands, A place is not an Object, 2012. Billboard. Image courtesy of C.C.A Derry-Londonderry.

In keeping with his interest in ‘over-looked, forgotten and highly layered narratives’, Sean Lynch conducted a research-based, archival inquiry entitled The Project (continued…). In 1988 American artist Jimmie Durham created a temporary, site-specific artwork within Derry’s city walls, based on local information gathered from the public. Reviving the intrigue surrounding Durham’s sculptural intervention, Lynch produced and distributed a publication featuring an assemblage of images from local newspapers portraying events that took place in Derry in the late 80s. In animating these forgotten fragments or frozen historical moments, ‘potential synchronicities are revealed’, as Lynch articulated in a public conversation with Declan McGonagle at the CCA.

 
For his contribution to the exhibition, Séamus Nolan facilitated View Points: a series of walking tours based on suggestions from participants about good vantage points in the city. It was an invitation to wander and to take in the sights (such as Austin’s department store, which provided a panoramic view from the 5th floor) but also to chat with fellow walkers, discussing the topics relevant to us as a semi-random gathering of strangers in an artistic context. Anyone who is familiar with Nolan’s previous work will know that he has a real skill for filtering complexity through blindingly simple channels. Like Francis Alÿs’ ‘simple acts’, this urban wandering – part flânerie, part dérive – leads to an experience of local insights and temporary or changing narratives within the city.
 
As a method of creative production, this model acknowledges the value in human interaction, and gathers inspiration from the digital commons (crowd sourcing, collective intelligence, user-generated content). Cultural theory, such as that surrounding the concepts of ‘social capital’ and the ‘rhetorical public sphere’, seemed to underpin much of the exhibition, with an emphasis on the interactive role of the audience in completing the artworks on a personal and collective level.
 
Seán Lynch’s conversation with Declan McGonagle, already referred to, provided a fitting close to the exhibition. McGonagle talked about his involvement in Derry’s Orchard Gallery in the 80s, which involvement issued from a sense of ‘responsibility to the locality’. In 1987 the gallery commissioned Anthony Gormley’s Untitled (Sculpture for City Walls), which remains Derry’s most culturally significant public artwork. Originally consisting of three cruciform cast-iron men, and symbolising divisions within the city, the sculptures suffered a turbulent history of graffiti, fire and vandalism. ‘The knowledge and meaning surrounding the city walls could only be generated from within Derry,’ stated McGonagle, adding that ‘the Peace Process was as much a cultural process as it was a political one – the division was not just about territory, but the identity that could be claimed, with a “cultural baseline” eventually being reached’.
 
Potentially the upcoming Derry-Londonderry City of Culture 2013 will be an extension of post-conflict regeneration. When asked how a role for art might be negotiated in relation to economics and culture-branding, Declan declared his faith that ‘art will always find a way to take the form it needs’. Perhaps all that is required is a vantage point, from which to negotiate, and to watch form unfold.
 
 
Contour of the Commons ran from 22 September – 28 October 2012.

]]>
Simon Starling: Never the Same River (Possible Futures, Probable Pasts) http://enclavereview.org/simon-starling-never-the-same-river-possible-futures-probable-pasts/ Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:52:29 +0000 http://enclavereview.org/?p=844 In Never the Same River, Simon Starling anticipates possible futures for Camden Arts Centre by juxtaposing a range of works from its past exhibition programme with pieces by younger artists. Indeed, the show’s aim, to destabilise the present by attending to its past and its future, is shared in various ways by each of the individual works, which were selected for their ability to ‘worry at the borders of our understanding of time’.
 
David Lamelas’ A Study of Relationships Between Inner and Outer Space was first filmed and screened at Camden Arts Centre during the run up to the Apollo moon landing in 1969. This documentary style film begins inside the gallery, with long shots of the exhibition space. The scope is then expanded and we see Finchley Road itself. As the camera continues to zoom out, by way of a rocket ascending, we get an overview of London including aerial maps and statistics concerning the population, transport networks and communication systems of the time. The film concludes with a passer-by speculating on a future in space. Viewing this film in the same location as it was originally shot makes us acutely aware of the time that has elapsed since the film was first screened. This positioning of the viewer in the same location in space seems to dramatise the distance felt between different historical moments and this effect serves as a good introduction to the rest of Starling’s show. Indeed, all of the works that had been exhibited previously are placed in exactly the same position that they once occupied.
 
Matthew Buckingham’s False Future (2007), a 16mm film installation depicting an anonymous looking bridge in Leeds, was originally exhibited as part of his solo show of the same year. Filmed during the daytime, the footage shows passers-by mundanely going about their business. A French narrator then begins to tell the story of Louis Le Prince, the little-known inventor who developed a working motion picture system at least five years before the Lumière Brothers. Had Le Prince not mysteriously disappeared aboard a train between Dijon and Paris in 1890, he would most likely be known today as the originator of cinema and the medium of film would also have existed five years earlier. The narrator informs us that twenty-six frames of film survived Le Prince, and he goes on to describe the footage which appears to correspond to the footage on screen. This work enters into dialogue with that of Lamelas as the same location in space is viewed again at a different time. Placed next to Buckingham’s work is Douglas Huebler’s Duration Piece #31 Boston (1974), first exhibited at CAC in 2002. Huebler’s black-and-white photograph depicts a naked woman smiling for the camera. This photograph was taken on December 31st 1973 at 1/8 of a second before midnight. The exposure time was 1/4 of a second and because of this the woman’s body occupies an undecidable temporal position, located halfway between 1973 and 1974. The juxtaposition of these works by Buckingham and Huebler was predetermined, due to their previous appearance at CAC, however both works also seem comfortable together as explorations of the nature and history of time-based media.
 
Mike Nelson: A studio apparatus for Camden Arts Centre; an introductory structure: Introduction, a lexicon of phenomena and information association, futurobjectics, (in three sections), mysterious island*, or Temporary monument (1998). Installation view, Never The Same River (Possible Futures, Probable Pasts) – Selected by Simon Starling, 2010. Courtesy the artist and Camden Arts Centre. © Camden Arts Centre. Photo Andy Keate.
Mike Nelson: A studio apparatus for Camden Arts Centre; an introductory structure: Introduction, a lexicon of phenomena and information association, futurobjectics, (in three sections), mysterious island*, or Temporary monument (1998). Installation view, Never The Same River (Possible Futures, Probable Pasts) – Selected by Simon Starling, 2010. Courtesy the artist and Camden Arts Centre. © Camden Arts Centre. Photo Andy Keate.

Two works concerned with time travel both making their debut here are Sean Lynch’s DeLorean Progress Report (2010), and Jeremy Millar’s The Man who Looked Back (2010). Lynch’s project traces the DeLorean car to the bottom of the Irish Sea, combining photographs of the rusty material on the sea bed with hand pressed stainless steel models of the DeLorean roof and wing panels. These models are instantly recognisable as an icon of time travel from the 1980s, made famous by Spielberg’s Back to the Future trilogy. Millar’s archival work The Man Who Looked Back continues the artist’s preoccupation with German art historian Aby Warburg. Photographic reproductions of images taken from art history (all relating to the myth of Orpheus, for whom ‘looking back’ had tragic consequences) are posted onto hessian covered free-standing boards, giving the project the aged look of an historical museum display. Among these older images are a number of stills taken from Chris Marker’s La Jetée (1962), one of the most convincing expressions of time-travel in film.

 
As Starling anticipates CAC’s future programme with works by Lynch and Millar, Graham Gussin’s Fall (7200-1) (1998) exploits an agitated sense of expectation concerning a future event. Fall dominates the main gallery space and consists of a large projection of a lake coupled with a hard drive and computer that houses generating software randomly triggering an event in which we see something fall out of the sky, dramatically disturbing the surface of the lake. This event occurs so infrequently that the work becomes not so much about the disturbance but about the possibility of witnessing it, the state of anticipation holding the viewer in front of the tranquil scene for long periods of time, often with no reward.
 
Starling’s show works coherently on many levels, engaging the viewer’s collective and social memory whilst also engaging with the memories and objects that haunt CAC’s history. Starling himself is one such ghostly figure, now returning to the centre after a residency in 1999 and a solo show in 2000. For his solo show Starling had installed a roughly-built stove entitled Burn-Time in Gallery 3. When CAC was refurbished soon after, the architects, without realising the stove to be a temporary edition, included it in their plans. Starling’s own work is now an integral part of CAC’s structure, a strange coincidence because his great-great-uncle was the architect of the original building. Starling’s project is inspired by this meeting across time, between the architect who designed the Centre’s outer space and his future nephew, who time and again has transformed its inner space.
 
 
Simon Starling: Never the Same River was on view 16 December 2010 – 20 February 2011.

]]>
Seán Lynch: Peregrine Falcons Visit Moyross http://enclavereview.org/sean-lynch-peregrine-falcons-visit-moyross/ Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:48:14 +0000 http://enclavereview.org/?p=418 Recent  press  reports  have  the  Moyross  area  of  Limerick marked as a bad and troubled place. Petrol bombs, shootings, families forced to flee; a catalogue of modern miseries and infrastructural failings that are ripe  for  popular  readership,  and  a  stigmatism  for  the  community that lives there.
 
Sean Lynch’s Peregrine Falcons Visit Moyross (2008) is a video work that attempts to create a different visual register  of  the  place.  In  2008,  the  artist  introduced  three specially trained peregrine falcons to Moyross. There, with miniature cameras attached between their wings,  the  falcons  commanded  the  skies  and  stalked  the ground with a primal indifference to bad reputations or social disadvantage.
 
The  resulting  work  is  a  three‐minute  edit  from  the  falcons’ erratic navigation over and above the residential  buildings  and  indeterminable  green  areas of  Moyross.  There  are  moments  in  the  video  where  the speed and mobility of the falcon (the fastest creature  in  the  world)  becomes  the  work’s  dominant  effect. An acceleration of stoops, jolts and sharp changes  in  direction,  amounts  to  a  flickering,  exalted  view of the area. It’s a suburban application of a wildlife  documentary  technique:  the  camera  is  attached to the falcon in a way similar to that used to track  animal  behaviour  patterns  for  the  armchair  observer. A weird sublimation of animal eyes for human kind.
 
There are also moments of pause. The falcon, perched upon  a  rooftop  where  it  tactically  considers  its  next  move, allows us to see the rows of houses, the network  of  roads,  and  parts  of  a  structural  plan  of  Moyross that has been the subject of much contention and blame.
 
Consistent  with  Sean  Lynch’s  previous  works  and  projects is the cultivation of histories that are legible within  their  local  context  as  equally  as  within  the  languages and positions of current artistic culture. Peregrine Falcons Visit Moyross shares in this respect. The work has demonstrable community engagements (the  support  of  local  newspapers  and  the  free  distribution of DVD copies, as testimonial, if token, examples). Yet, it is also a work that is sensitive to the typical  indulgence  of  artistic  positioning  within  a  community that does not seek artistic intervention, which  is  more  often  imposed  and  sanctioned  by  civil  authority agendas.
 
If  the  use  of  camera‐strapped  falcons  represents  a  deferral of the artist’s own responsibilities of vision, it is a significant manoeuvre in the context of Moyross. Built in the late ’70s and early ’80s as a social housing ‘project’, Moyross continues to be the object of well­‐ intended  speculation.  As  controversy  mounts  about  new plans – announced in 2008 – to regenerate the area  once  again,  it  seems  vital  to  achieve  a  representation of Moyross that does not implicate itself  in  the  double-cross  of  these  visions  or  any  misguided overconfidence concerning art’s direct social agency.
 
For  three  minutes,  no  more,  we  borrow  the  falcons’  view: a representation subtracted of reputation, speculation and vision. And Moyross – a place many of us have never been to – begins to feel a little roomier somehow.
 
 
Sean Lynch’s Peregrine Falcons Visit Moyross was on view at the Crawford Art Gallery, 8 – 15 May 2010.

]]>
EV+A http://enclavereview.org/eva/ Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:34:50 +0000 http://enclavereview.org/?p=340 I  agree  with  Jas  Elsner:  art  history  and  criticism  translate objects into words, a rhetorical effort called ekphrasis, which assumes that the spirit of an artwork can  be  translated  between  media,  a  tendentious  undertaking, always. But, then, this EV+A is ‘very eclectic’,  as  curator  and  architect  Elizabeth  Hatz  admitted  at Species of Space at LSAD on 12 May, (so pick and choose). Well, what would it be like if your local library shelved  books  by  colour,  say,  in  gradations  of  green  (Wang Ruobing, Eat Me)? Or if we removed all the logos  from  sight  in  a  Legoland  of  cardboard  packaging (Leo Fitzmaurice, You’ve changed and grown in so many  ways)?  What  if  the  anonymous  Viewer’s  Gaze  into the frame were returned by the contemplative stare  of  an  owl  (Oonagh  O’Brien,  Owl)?  What  if  you  were a naked male, performing repetitive gestures in a  gloomy  video  of  a  post-­apocalyptic  space  (Kaspar  Aus, Lost Space)?
 
The  title  of  this  year’s  EV+A  is  Matters.  Hatz’s  ‘red  thread’ turns out to be ethical concern: ‘how can we cope  with  this  situation?  We  have  to  do  something  about it.’ Liu Wei’s documentary Hopeless Land, witnesses. It is both exotic and disturbing: impoverished farmers  close  up,  making  a  living  as  gleaners  in  the  landscape of rubbish-tips on the outskirts of Beijing. You stand and watch the waste and the working day of pre-­industrial China whose state capitalism we love to hate. It reminds me of Agnès Varda’s The Gleaners and I  (2000),  with  the  difference  that  Varda  engaged  with  all her strangers and interviewed them two years later.  A  closer  comparison  would  be  Wang  Jianwei’s  Living Elsewhere, seen in the Glucksman, recording the everyday of Chinese squatters. Both turn the real (and its  people)  into  an  iconic  moving  image  for  silent  reflection. 
 Angela Fulcher: Hurry on Sundown (2010). Installation shot courtesy of the artist.

Angela Fulcher: Hurry on Sundown (2010). Installation shot courtesy of the artist.

Also  in  the  same  concrete,  unfinished  offices  (a  Creative Limerick space at the centre of this EV+A) with  their  Banham-­style  Brutalism,  Loretto  Cooney’s  delicate oil paintings (Did you mean fir tree), their imagery  sifted  from  the  Web,  echoed  the  desaturated  hues of Simon English’s Klee-­sized Untitled Scenes from a Journey.

 
Actually,  the  entire  Catherine  Street  and  Faber  Studios (another new Limerick art space run by graduates) were at the centre of many events organized by Spiritstore’s  Culture  Dig  Weekend  which  transformed  an anonymous street into relationships between people,  with  flamenco,  astronomy  talks,  ghost  walks,  poetry readings, street theatre, film shorts, and an Art in The Making  do,  where  Limerick  and  Crawford  art  students met for Kevin Flanagan’s talk ‘Copyleft and Creative Commons’ and to plan ahead.
 
Finally,  the  LSAD  Church  Gallery  exhibited  Shin Egashira’s Beauty of Our Pain, a set of wooden sculptures  whose  ancient  craft  shuns  screws  or  nails.  Monumental objects that would look more in a place at  a  siege  than  at  a  work-­out,  these  full-­size  fitness  machines were complemented by a video showing them in use in a real fitness centre next to modern day contraptions.  The  accompanying  isometric  drawings  take the medieval association further, suggesting that what  people  accept  in  trying  to  conform  to  contemporary norms of alienated beauty is tantamount to torture.
 
 
Surplus Value
Occupy Space, Limerick
David Brancaleone

 
Curated  by  Michelle  Horrigan,  Surplus  Value  was  hosted by Occupy Space, one of the many new art spaces  in  empty  shops  and  offices,  made  available  thanks to Creative Limerick. Technically, surplus value is what is left over after the worker has been paid her wage in the capitalist mode of production, in which labour power becomes a commodity with an exchange value. To me, the phrase ‘surplus value’ brings to mind the  consequences  today  of  the  logic  of  profit:  for  instance, the madness of tough-love capitalism and a thirty-­year headlong plunge into financialization (speculation  on  derivatives,  hedge  funds,  and  profiteering  from interest on debt). In today’s context (economic meltdown),  only  the  risk  of  impending  bankruptcy  makes imaginable that privately owned banks can be purchased by public funds (and somehow, it is All Our Fault).
 
Playful irony issues from Sean Lynch’s The Bandits Live Comfortably  in  the  Ruin  (2006),  which  appropriates  vintage footage of the failed demolition of a Limerick mill  in  the  1980s  –  and  puts  it  on  a  loop.  So  it  keeps  failing. The value of Hayek’s and then Friedman’s Chicago  School  neoliberal  economics  are  also  on  a  loop and keep failing; meantime, speculation replaces production  (here)  and  exploitation  of  manual  labour  has mostly shifted to where we cannot see it (the Majority  World).  In  the  West,  following  the  downsizing, restructuring and collapse of manufacturing, white collar surplus value is extracted increasingly  (but  not  exclusively)  from  social  communication or ‘immaterial labour’. Its exploitation is much harder to measure, because it always exceeds the working day.
 
As for exploitation, Mike Fitzpatrick’s  Dealer  Ties  (1996-­97), a rack of sixty white ties, each sporting the photograph  of  a  New  York  art  dealer,  brings  to  mind  greedy gallery takings and Anglo Saxon ‘club ties’, thus conjuring  up  the  intimate  atmosphere  of  the  art  market – with an exception, a homeless woman slightly set apart. Perhaps what the clique excludes is her  value.  That  concept  of  ‘exclusion’  was  a  (moral)  fallback position in the 1990s, after any notion of (social  and  political)  emancipation  had  been  abandoned. For The New Spirit of Capitalism (2005), the  ‘artistic  critique’  of  capitalism  has  always  hinged  on consumption and alienation, but Surplus Value draws  my  attention  to  the  ‘social  critique’  also  discussed by Boltanski and Chiapello, aimed at production, labour and exploitation.
 
Angela  Fulcher’s  Hurry  On  Sundown  is  an  afterthought on such matters. It hangs from above, making a second ceiling out of what looked like a large multi coloured kite, stretching from white wall to white wall, stitched together from after‐the‐event tents, leftovers from  a  music  festival.  Some  circa  ’68  music  festivals  reclaimed public space, but then business got in on the act and something bigger than just the show was suppressed. An afterthought. In many ways, theory is also  just  that:  an  afterthought,  a  fidelity;  what  still  needs to be said (and done) after the event. It thinks again,  suggesting  the  possibility  of  intervention,  not  nostalgia.
 
 
Surplus Value was on view 7 May–7 June 2010.

]]>